|
Meadows v. United States, 281 U.S. 271 (1930)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Meadows v. United States, 281 U.S. 271 (1930)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 281 U.S. 264, click here.
Meadows v. United States No. 269 Argued March 5, 1930 Decided April 14, 1930 281 U.S. 271
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
1. The district court is without jurisdiction to review a decision of the Director of the Veterans’ Bureau, denying (under § 408 of the Act of 1921, carried into the Act of 1924 as § 304, c. 320, 43 Stat. 607, 625; U.S.C. Title 38, § 515) an application for reinstatement of a lapsed policy on the ground that the applicant, at the time of making the application, was totally and permanently disabled. P. 273.
2. Section 19 of the World War Veterans’ Act of 1924, as amended, U.S.C. Title 38, § 445, which confers jurisdiction upon the district courts to hear and determine controversies arising out of claims under contracts of insurance in the event of disagreement between the Bureau and claimants, does not apply to a claim for reinstatement of a lapsed policy. P. 274.
32 F.2d 440 affirmed.
Certiorari, 280 U.S. 550, to review a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which, on the ground that the trial court was without jurisdiction, reversed and directed dismissal of a judgment of the district court against the United States in an action to require the reinstatement of a lapsed war risk insurance policy.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Meadows v. United States, 281 U.S. 271 (1930) in 281 U.S. 271 519 U.S. 272. Original Sources, accessed October 3, 2024, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=LJVYXCJE6CZ1DL8.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Meadows v. United States, 281 U.S. 271 (1930), in 281 U.S. 271, page 519 U.S. 272. Original Sources. 3 Oct. 2024. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=LJVYXCJE6CZ1DL8.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Meadows v. United States, 281 U.S. 271 (1930). cited in 1930, 281 U.S. 271, pp.519 U.S. 272. Original Sources, retrieved 3 October 2024, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=LJVYXCJE6CZ1DL8.
|