|
Markuson v. Boucher, 175 U.S. 184 (1899)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Markuson v. Boucher, 175 U.S. 184 (1899)
Markuson v. Boucher No. 77 Argued and submitted October 27, 1899 Decided November 20, 1899 175 U.S. 184
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED
STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Syllabus
It is again held that judgments of the state courts in criminal cases should not be reviewed by federal courts through writs of habeas corpus, but the proper remedy in such case, when it is claimed that some right under the Constitution of the United States has been denied the person convicted, is by writ of error.
The statement of the case is in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Markuson v. Boucher, 175 U.S. 184 (1899) in 175 U.S. 184 Original Sources, accessed September 3, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=M1A4ZPSQPWGQAWB.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Markuson v. Boucher, 175 U.S. 184 (1899), in 175 U.S. 184, Original Sources. 3 Sep. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=M1A4ZPSQPWGQAWB.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Markuson v. Boucher, 175 U.S. 184 (1899). cited in 1899, 175 U.S. 184. Original Sources, retrieved 3 September 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=M1A4ZPSQPWGQAWB.
|