|
|
Hattiesburg Unions v. Broome Co., 377 U.S. 126 (1964)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Hattiesburg Unions v. Broome Co., 377 U.S. 126 (1964)
Hattiesburg Building & Trades Council v. Broome No. 669 Decided April 27, 1964 377 U.S. 126
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI
Syllabus
State court had no jurisdiction to enjoin the arguably unfair labor practice of union picketing at a secondary employer’s premise, since the National Labor Relations board had jurisdiction, its standards being satisfied by reference to the operation of either the primary or, as here, the secondary, employer.
Certiorari granted: 247 Miss. 458, 153 So.2d 695, reversed.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Hattiesburg Unions v. Broome Co., 377 U.S. 126 (1964) in 377 U.S. 126 Original Sources, accessed November 3, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=M1LVZN4BJCGZM78.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Hattiesburg Unions v. Broome Co., 377 U.S. 126 (1964), in 377 U.S. 126, Original Sources. 3 Nov. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=M1LVZN4BJCGZM78.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Hattiesburg Unions v. Broome Co., 377 U.S. 126 (1964). cited in 1964, 377 U.S. 126. Original Sources, retrieved 3 November 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=M1LVZN4BJCGZM78.
|