|
Labor Board v. Dant, 344 U.S. 375 (1953)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Labor Board v. Dant, 344 U.S. 375 (1953)
National Labor Relations Board v. Dant No. 97 Argued December 15, 1952 Decided February 2, 1953 344 U.S. 375
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Section 9(h) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, does not preclude issuance by the National Labor Relations Board of an unfair labor practice complaint under § 10(c) after the required non-Communist affidavits have been filed -- even though they had not been filed when the union filed the charge with the Board under § 10(b). Pp. 376-385.
195 F.2d 299, reversed.
On the ground that § 9(h) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended by the Labor Management Relations Act, had not been complied with, the Court of Appeals set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board requiring an employer to cease and desist from unfair labor practices in violation of § 8(a)(1) and (3). 195 F.2d 299. This Court granted certiorari. 344 U.S. 811. Reversed, p. 385.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Labor Board v. Dant, 344 U.S. 375 (1953) in 344 U.S. 375 344 U.S. 376. Original Sources, accessed August 30, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=MA5CGXMFJB68T31.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Labor Board v. Dant, 344 U.S. 375 (1953), in 344 U.S. 375, page 344 U.S. 376. Original Sources. 30 Aug. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=MA5CGXMFJB68T31.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Labor Board v. Dant, 344 U.S. 375 (1953). cited in 1953, 344 U.S. 375, pp.344 U.S. 376. Original Sources, retrieved 30 August 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=MA5CGXMFJB68T31.
|