|
|
Varner v. New Hampshire Savings Bank, 240 U.S. 617 (1916)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Varner v. New Hampshire Savings Bank, 240 U.S. 617 (1916)
Varner v. New Hampshire Savings Bank No. 264, 265, 266 Argued March 8, 9, 1916 Decided April 3, 1916 240 U.S. 617
APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
The essential question in this case being one of fact, and notwithstanding the different conclusions reached by the courts below, this Court, after consideration thereof, holds that the evidence sustains the conclusion of the circuit court of appeals that there was no such commencement of building as would give the mechanics’ liens priority over the mortgages on the property within the meaning of the Kansas statute.
216 F. 721 affirmed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Varner v. New Hampshire Savings Bank, 240 U.S. 617 (1916) in 240 U.S. 617 240 U.S. 619. Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=MDHU8FNWR85TRK9.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Varner v. New Hampshire Savings Bank, 240 U.S. 617 (1916), in 240 U.S. 617, page 240 U.S. 619. Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=MDHU8FNWR85TRK9.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Varner v. New Hampshire Savings Bank, 240 U.S. 617 (1916). cited in 1916, 240 U.S. 617, pp.240 U.S. 619. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=MDHU8FNWR85TRK9.
|