|
|
Stilz v. United States, 269 U.S. 144 (1925)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Stilz v. United States, 269 U.S. 144 (1925)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 269 U.S. 140, click here.
Stilz v. United States No. 38 Argued October 13, 14, 1925 Decided November 16, 1925 269 U.S. 144
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS
Syllabus
A finding by the Court of Claims that claimant’s patents were not infringed by the government is a finding of fact, and therefore not reexaminable by this Court. P. 147.
59 Ct.Cls. 21 affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims in an action brought by the appellant to recover compensation for use and manufacture by the United States of certain oil burners alleged to infringe his patents.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Stilz v. United States, 269 U.S. 144 (1925) in 269 U.S. 144 269 U.S. 145. Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=MGNSY4QJ16PB4D1.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Stilz v. United States, 269 U.S. 144 (1925), in 269 U.S. 144, page 269 U.S. 145. Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=MGNSY4QJ16PB4D1.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Stilz v. United States, 269 U.S. 144 (1925). cited in 1925, 269 U.S. 144, pp.269 U.S. 145. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=MGNSY4QJ16PB4D1.
|