|
|
Hughes v. Thompson, 415 U.S. 1301 (1974)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Hughes v. Thompson, 415 U.S. 1301 (1974)
Hughes v. Thompson No. A-719 Decided January 25, 1974 415 U.S. 1301
ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT
OF MANDAMUS AND/OR PROHIBITION
Syllabus
Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition to require the District Court to rule on petitioners’ motion to dismiss the indictment against them prior to the arraignment, is denied, since whether the latter motion should be disposed of prior to the arraignment rests in the District Court’s sound discretion.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Hughes v. Thompson, 415 U.S. 1301 (1974) in 415 U.S. 1301 Original Sources, accessed August 30, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=MJMYBI6QW2B8B6W.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Hughes v. Thompson, 415 U.S. 1301 (1974), in 415 U.S. 1301, Original Sources. 30 Aug. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=MJMYBI6QW2B8B6W.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Hughes v. Thompson, 415 U.S. 1301 (1974). cited in 1974, 415 U.S. 1301. Original Sources, retrieved 30 August 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=MJMYBI6QW2B8B6W.
|