|
|
First National Bank of San Jose v. California, 262 U.S. 366 (1923)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
First National Bank of San Jose v. California, 262 U.S. 366 (1923)
First National Bank of San Jose v. California No. 276 Submitted April 13, 1923 Decided June 4, 1923 262 U.S. 366
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Syllabus
A state law providing for the escheat to the bank deposits after they have remained intact and unclaimed for more than twenty years, when no notice of his residence has been filed with the bank by the depositor or any claimant, is void as applied to deposits in National Banks. Calif.Code Civ.Proc. § 1273; U.S.Rev.Stats. § 5136. P. 369.
186 Cal. 746 reversed.
Error to a judgment of the Supreme Court of California affirming a judgment for the state against the plaintiff in error bank in an action to declare unclaimed deposits escheated to the state.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," First National Bank of San Jose v. California, 262 U.S. 366 (1923) in 262 U.S. 366 Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=N3BREPTDVMW4HDU.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." First National Bank of San Jose v. California, 262 U.S. 366 (1923), in 262 U.S. 366, Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=N3BREPTDVMW4HDU.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in First National Bank of San Jose v. California, 262 U.S. 366 (1923). cited in 1923, 262 U.S. 366. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=N3BREPTDVMW4HDU.
|