|
|
Sanford v. Ainsa, 228 U.S. 705 (1913)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Sanford v. Ainsa, 228 U.S. 705 (1913)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 228 U.S. 702, click here.
Sanford v. Ainsa No. 504 Argued May 5, 1913 Decided May 26, 1913 228 U.S. 705
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA
Syllabus
This Court rarely disturbs local decisions of the territorial court on question of local practice.
The supreme court of the territory, having held that, under § 10 of Act 44 of 1899 of Arizona transferring cases from the district court of one county to the corresponding court of another county newly organized, the former court retained jurisdiction until the condition of the transfer were fulfilled, this Court follow that decision.
13 Ariz. 287 affirmed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Sanford v. Ainsa, 228 U.S. 705 (1913) in 228 U.S. 705 228 U.S. 706. Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=NK638DDK8VFFFK8.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Sanford v. Ainsa, 228 U.S. 705 (1913), in 228 U.S. 705, page 228 U.S. 706. Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=NK638DDK8VFFFK8.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Sanford v. Ainsa, 228 U.S. 705 (1913). cited in 1913, 228 U.S. 705, pp.228 U.S. 706. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=NK638DDK8VFFFK8.
|