|
|
Hubsch v. United States, 338 U.S. 440 (1949)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Hubsch v. United States, 338 U.S. 440 (1949)
Hubsch v. United States No. 379 Decided December 19, 1949 * 338 U.S. 440
ON APPLICATION OF PETITIONERS AND THE SOLICITOR GENERAL
FOR APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT
Syllabus
The authority and responsibility for passing upon a proposed compromise of 3 claim arising under the Federal Tort Claims Act, after commencement of an action thereon, are imposed by 28 U.S.C. § 2677 on the District Court, and such a proposed compromise, submitted here after grant of certiorari to review a judgment of the Court of Appeals affirming judgments of the District Court on such claims, is referred to the District Court for consideration and disposition.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Hubsch v. United States, 338 U.S. 440 (1949) in 338 U.S. 440 Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=NNGT35X2FJMGREG.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Hubsch v. United States, 338 U.S. 440 (1949), in 338 U.S. 440, Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=NNGT35X2FJMGREG.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Hubsch v. United States, 338 U.S. 440 (1949). cited in 1949, 338 U.S. 440. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=NNGT35X2FJMGREG.
|