|
|
Chew Hing Lung v. Wise, 176 U.S. 156 (1900)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Chew Hing Lung v. Wise, 176 U.S. 156 (1900)
Chew Hing Lung v. Wise No. 86 Argued December 11-12, 1899 Decided January 22, 1900 176 U.S. 156
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT
OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Tapioca flour is not a preparation fit for use as starch, and under the Tariff Act of October 1, 1890, c. 1244, paragraph 720, is entitled to free entry.
The designation of an article, eo nomine, either for duty or as exempt from duty must prevail over words of a general description which might otherwise include the article specially designated.
The statement of the case will be found in the opinion of the Court.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Chew Hing Lung v. Wise, 176 U.S. 156 (1900) in 176 U.S. 156 Original Sources, accessed June 30, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=P9NG1ZMS7IQQPL8.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Chew Hing Lung v. Wise, 176 U.S. 156 (1900), in 176 U.S. 156, Original Sources. 30 Jun. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=P9NG1ZMS7IQQPL8.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Chew Hing Lung v. Wise, 176 U.S. 156 (1900). cited in 1900, 176 U.S. 156. Original Sources, retrieved 30 June 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=P9NG1ZMS7IQQPL8.
|