|
|
Mincey v. Arizona, 434 U.S. 1343 (1977)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Mincey v. Arizona, 434 U.S. 1343 (1977)
Mincey v. Arizona No. A-302 (77-5353) Decided October 6, 1977 434 U.S. 1343
ON APPLICATION FOR STAY
Syllabus
Where the Arizona Supreme Court reversed applicant’s convictions on murder and assault counts because of erroneous jury instructions but affirmed his convictions on related drug counts, his application for stay, pending disposition of his pending petition for certiorari to review the drug convictions, of his second trial on the murder and assault counts, based on claims that illegally obtained evidence will be admitted at the second trial, is denied, since such claims must be asserted through normal post-trial review procedures.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Mincey v. Arizona, 434 U.S. 1343 (1977) in 434 U.S. 1343 Original Sources, accessed August 30, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PAFFSUM5U4J8B69.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Mincey v. Arizona, 434 U.S. 1343 (1977), in 434 U.S. 1343, Original Sources. 30 Aug. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PAFFSUM5U4J8B69.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Mincey v. Arizona, 434 U.S. 1343 (1977). cited in 1977, 434 U.S. 1343. Original Sources, retrieved 30 August 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PAFFSUM5U4J8B69.
|