|
|
King v. Putnam Investment Co., 248 U.S. 23 (1918)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
King v. Putnam Investment Co., 248 U.S. 23 (1918)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 248 U.S. 9, click here.
King v. Putnam Investment Company No. 10 Submitted November 7, 1918 Decided November 18, 1918 248 U.S. 23
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF KANSAS
Syllabus
The contention that a contract of agency to sell real estate was void because federal lands, under homestead entry, were included presents no federal question where the state court found they were not included and the record supports the finding.
Writ of error to review 96 Kan. 109 dismissed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," King v. Putnam Investment Co., 248 U.S. 23 (1918) in 248 U.S. 23 Original Sources, accessed July 2, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PBI9FNBCR1BMIWU.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." King v. Putnam Investment Co., 248 U.S. 23 (1918), in 248 U.S. 23, Original Sources. 2 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PBI9FNBCR1BMIWU.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in King v. Putnam Investment Co., 248 U.S. 23 (1918). cited in 1918, 248 U.S. 23. Original Sources, retrieved 2 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PBI9FNBCR1BMIWU.
|