|
|
Comstock v. Eagleton, 196 U.S. 99 (1905)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Comstock v. Eagleton, 196 U.S. 99 (1905)
Comstock v. Eagleton No. 105 Submitted December 15, 1904 Decided January 3, 1905 196 U.S. 99
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA
Syllabus
Under § 9, Act of May 2, 1890, 26 Stat. 81, c. 182, final judgments of the Supreme Court of the Territory of Oklahoma in actions at law can only
be revised by this Court as are judgments of the circuit courts of the
United States in similar actions -- by writ of error, and not by appeal.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Comstock v. Eagleton, 196 U.S. 99 (1905) in 196 U.S. 99 Original Sources, accessed September 6, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PCWDDWLNSQ7KRUS.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Comstock v. Eagleton, 196 U.S. 99 (1905), in 196 U.S. 99, Original Sources. 6 Sep. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PCWDDWLNSQ7KRUS.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Comstock v. Eagleton, 196 U.S. 99 (1905). cited in 1905, 196 U.S. 99. Original Sources, retrieved 6 September 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PCWDDWLNSQ7KRUS.
|