|
|
Califano v. McRae, 434 U.S. 1301 (1977)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Califano v. McRae, 434 U.S. 1301 (1977)
Califano v. McRae No. A6 Decided July 20, 1977 434 U.S. 1301
ON APPLICATION FOR STAY
Syllabus
In view of this Court’s Rule 58 permitting a petition for rehearing to be granted only by a Justice who concurred in the initial judgment or decision, MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL abstains from acting on an application for stay, pending a petition for rehearing, of the Court’s order vacating the District Court’s judgment and remanding for further consideration in light of Maher v. Roe, 432 U.S. 464, and Beal v. Doe, 432 U.S. 438, since he dissented in both of those cases.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Califano v. McRae, 434 U.S. 1301 (1977) in 434 U.S. 1301 Original Sources, accessed August 30, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PG2S7AD6GDEFX71.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Califano v. McRae, 434 U.S. 1301 (1977), in 434 U.S. 1301, Original Sources. 30 Aug. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PG2S7AD6GDEFX71.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Califano v. McRae, 434 U.S. 1301 (1977). cited in 1977, 434 U.S. 1301. Original Sources, retrieved 30 August 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PG2S7AD6GDEFX71.
|