|
|
Hanover National Bank v. Suddath (No. 2), 215 U.S. 122 (1909)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Hanover National Bank v. Suddath (No. 2), 215 U.S. 122 (1909)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 215 U.S. 110, click here.
Hanover National Bank of New York v. Suddath (No. 2) No. 13 Argued April 20, 1909 Decided November 29, 1909 215 U.S. 122
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Where a bank, after refusing to discount paper sent to it by the insolvent for that purpose, has retained the paper, it cannot, as against general creditors, set off against that paper, or its proceeds, the bankrupt’s overdraft, although made after such refusal and pending the retention of the paper.
153 F. 1022 affirmed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Hanover National Bank v. Suddath (No. 2), 215 U.S. 122 (1909) in 215 U.S. 122 215 U.S. 123. Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=Q6ZDVQ8M6NS94GP.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Hanover National Bank v. Suddath (No. 2), 215 U.S. 122 (1909), in 215 U.S. 122, page 215 U.S. 123. Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=Q6ZDVQ8M6NS94GP.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Hanover National Bank v. Suddath (No. 2), 215 U.S. 122 (1909). cited in 1909, 215 U.S. 122, pp.215 U.S. 123. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=Q6ZDVQ8M6NS94GP.
|