|
|
Osborne v. Clark, 204 U.S. 565 (1907)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Osborne v. Clark, 204 U.S. 565 (1907)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 204 U.S. 562, click here.
Osborne v. Clark No. 159 Argued January 16, 1907 Decided February 25, 1907 204 U.S. 565
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE
Syllabus
The fact that a state statute which was assailed in the state court as invalid under the constitution of the state might have been assailed on similar grounds as also invalid under the Constitution of the United States does not give this Court jurisdiction to review under § 709, Rev.Stat., on writ of error where the objections to the decision under the Constitution of the United States were suggested for the first time on taking the writ of error.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Osborne v. Clark, 204 U.S. 565 (1907) in 204 U.S. 565 204 U.S. 567. Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=RPK18A647WNVL6J.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Osborne v. Clark, 204 U.S. 565 (1907), in 204 U.S. 565, page 204 U.S. 567. Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=RPK18A647WNVL6J.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Osborne v. Clark, 204 U.S. 565 (1907). cited in 1907, 204 U.S. 565, pp.204 U.S. 567. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=RPK18A647WNVL6J.
|