|
Blanco v. Hubbard, 220 U.S. 233 (1911)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Blanco v. Hubbard, 220 U.S. 233 (1911)
Blanco v. Hubbard No. 111 Argued March 17, 1911 Decided April 3, 1911 220 U.S. 233
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT
OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO
Syllabus
A demurrer in this case having been sustained, and the bill which sought to enjoin the defendant sheriff from selling under execution issued in Perez v. Fernandez, ante, p. 224, dismissed on the same grounds on which the same court refused to allow defendants in that suit, who were grantors of the plaintiffs in this suit, to come in and defend, and this Court having reversed the judgment in Perz v. Fernandez, and it appearing that the two cases were so inseparably united in the mind of the court below that the error in the one controlled its action in the other, held that the judgment in this case be also reversed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Blanco v. Hubbard, 220 U.S. 233 (1911) in 220 U.S. 233 Original Sources, accessed June 30, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=SIY16BAG6TEDTYP.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Blanco v. Hubbard, 220 U.S. 233 (1911), in 220 U.S. 233, Original Sources. 30 Jun. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=SIY16BAG6TEDTYP.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Blanco v. Hubbard, 220 U.S. 233 (1911). cited in 1911, 220 U.S. 233. Original Sources, retrieved 30 June 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=SIY16BAG6TEDTYP.
|