|
|
Westermann v. Nelson, 409 U.S. 1236 (1972)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Westermann v. Nelson, 409 U.S. 1236 (1972)
Westermann v. Nelson No. A-412 Decided October 20, 1972 409 U.S. 1236
ON MOTION FOR INJUNCTION
Syllabus
The motion for injunction pending appeal of candidates who failed to secure ballot placement for the November 7, 1972, election in Arizona is denied because orderly election processes would likely be disrupted by granting so tardy an application.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Westermann v. Nelson, 409 U.S. 1236 (1972) in 409 U.S. 1236 Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=TEX2H2QLP2BUGB4.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Westermann v. Nelson, 409 U.S. 1236 (1972), in 409 U.S. 1236, Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=TEX2H2QLP2BUGB4.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Westermann v. Nelson, 409 U.S. 1236 (1972). cited in 1972, 409 U.S. 1236. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=TEX2H2QLP2BUGB4.
|