|
United States Ex Rel. Rutz v. Levy, 268 U.S. 390 (1925)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United States Ex Rel. Rutz v. Levy, 268 U.S. 390 (1925)
United States ex Rel. Rutz v. Levy Nos. 935 , 936 , 937 , 938 Submitted April 13, 1925 Decided May 25, 1925 268 U.S. 390
Syllabus
An order made by a United States Commissioner, after hearing, in a removal proceeding (R.S. 1014), discharging the defendant for want of probable cause, may be persuasive, but it is not controlling upon a like application made later in the same district to the district judge. P. 393.
3 F.2d 816 affirmed.
Appeals from judgments of the district court quashing writs of habeas corpus.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United States Ex Rel. Rutz v. Levy, 268 U.S. 390 (1925) in 268 U.S. 390 268 U.S. 392. Original Sources, accessed August 30, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=TNFIJ7S1HU4W6JA.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United States Ex Rel. Rutz v. Levy, 268 U.S. 390 (1925), in 268 U.S. 390, page 268 U.S. 392. Original Sources. 30 Aug. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=TNFIJ7S1HU4W6JA.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United States Ex Rel. Rutz v. Levy, 268 U.S. 390 (1925). cited in 1925, 268 U.S. 390, pp.268 U.S. 392. Original Sources, retrieved 30 August 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=TNFIJ7S1HU4W6JA.
|