|
|
Murray v. Giarratano, 492 U.S. 1 (1989)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Murray v. Giarratano, 492 U.S. 1 (1989)
JUSTICE KENNEDY, with whom JUSTICE O’CONNOR joins, concurring in the judgment.
It cannot be denied that collateral relief proceedings are a central part of the review process for prisoners sentenced to death. As JUSTICE STEVENS observes, a substantial proportion of these prisoners succeed in having their death sentences vacated in habeas corpus proceedings. Post at 23-24, and n. 13. The complexity of our jurisprudence in this area, moreover, makes it unlikely that capital defendants will be able to file successful petitions for collateral relief without the assistance of persons learned in the law.
The requirement of meaningful access can be satisfied in various ways, however. This was made explicit in our decision in Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (1977). The intricacies and range of options are of sufficient complexity that state legislatures and prison administrators must be given "wide discretion" to select appropriate solutions. Id. at 833. Indeed, judicial imposition of a categorical remedy such as that adopted by the court below might pretermit other responsible solutions being considered in Congress and state legislatures. Assessments of the difficulties presented by collateral litigation in capital cases are now being conducted by committees of the American Bar Association and the Judicial Conference of the United States, and Congress has stated its intention to give the matter serious consideration. See 134 Cong.Rec. H11194 (Oct. 21, 1988) (providing for expedited consideration of proposals of the Judicial Conference committee).
Unlike Congress, this Court lacks the capacity to undertake the searching and comprehensive review called for in this area, for we can decide only the case before us. While Virginia has not adopted procedures for securing representation that are as far-reaching and effective as those available in other States, no prisoner on death row in Virginia has been unable to obtain counsel to represent him in postconviction proceedings, and Virginia’s prison system is staffed with institutional lawyers to assist in preparing petitions for postconviction relief. I am not prepared to say that this scheme violates the Constitution.
On the facts and record of this case, I concur in the judgment of the Court.
Contents:
Chicago: Kennedy, "Kennedy, J., Concurring," Murray v. Giarratano, 492 U.S. 1 (1989) in 492 U.S. 1 492 U.S. 15. Original Sources, accessed May 9, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=UHJN8Q7Z8TPWT9I.
MLA: Kennedy. "Kennedy, J., Concurring." Murray v. Giarratano, 492 U.S. 1 (1989), in 492 U.S. 1, page 492 U.S. 15. Original Sources. 9 May. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=UHJN8Q7Z8TPWT9I.
Harvard: Kennedy, 'Kennedy, J., Concurring' in Murray v. Giarratano, 492 U.S. 1 (1989). cited in 1989, 492 U.S. 1, pp.492 U.S. 15. Original Sources, retrieved 9 May 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=UHJN8Q7Z8TPWT9I.
|