|
|
Hammett v. Texas, 448 U.S. 725 (1980)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Hammett v. Texas, 448 U.S. 725 (1980)
MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN, dissenting.
I would not grant this pro se application summarily, but would set it for plenary consideration upon briefs and arguments submitted by petitioner’s appointed counsel and the State. See Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012, 1020 (1976) (dissenting opinion).
Contents:
Chicago:
Blackmun, "Blackmun, J., Dissenting," Hammett v. Texas, 448 U.S. 725 (1980) in 448 U.S. 725 Original Sources, accessed July 2, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=ULVYKLY93Q2CISL.
MLA:
Blackmun. "Blackmun, J., Dissenting." Hammett v. Texas, 448 U.S. 725 (1980), in 448 U.S. 725, Original Sources. 2 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=ULVYKLY93Q2CISL.
Harvard:
Blackmun, 'Blackmun, J., Dissenting' in Hammett v. Texas, 448 U.S. 725 (1980). cited in 1980, 448 U.S. 725. Original Sources, retrieved 2 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=ULVYKLY93Q2CISL.
|