|
|
Van Lare v. Hurley, 421 U.S. 338 (1975)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Van Lare v. Hurley, 421 U.S. 338 (1975)
MR. JUSTICE REHNQUIST, dissenting.
I do not think that the New York nonpaying lodgers regulation is in conflict with federal statutory law, for the reasons stated by Judge Hays in his opinion for the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Taylor v. Lavine, 497 F.2d 1208 (1974). I therefore reach the constitutional issues presented in No. 74-453, and conclude that the regulation is not constitutionally impermissible, for the reasons set forth by Judge Hays in his dissenting opinion in Hurley v. Van Lare, 380 F.Supp. 167, 177 (ED & SDNY 1974). I would thus affirm in No. 74-5054 and reverse in No. 7453.
Contents:
Chicago:
Rehnquist, "Rehnquist, J., Dissenting," Van Lare v. Hurley, 421 U.S. 338 (1975) in 421 U.S. 338 Original Sources, accessed July 9, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=USP86NYWCW4U54C.
MLA:
Rehnquist. "Rehnquist, J., Dissenting." Van Lare v. Hurley, 421 U.S. 338 (1975), in 421 U.S. 338, Original Sources. 9 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=USP86NYWCW4U54C.
Harvard:
Rehnquist, 'Rehnquist, J., Dissenting' in Van Lare v. Hurley, 421 U.S. 338 (1975). cited in 1975, 421 U.S. 338. Original Sources, retrieved 9 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=USP86NYWCW4U54C.
|