|
|
United States v. Goldman, 277 U.S. 229 (1928)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United States v. Goldman, 277 U.S. 229 (1928)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 277 U.S. 226, click here.
United States v. Goldman No. 723 Argued April 10, 1928 Decided May 14, 1928 277 U.S. 229
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Syllabus
1. A criminal contempt, committed by violation of an injunction decreed by a federal court, is an offense against the United States, and an information brought by the United States for the punishment of such a contempt is a "criminal case" within the meaning of the Criminal Appeals Act. P. 236.
2. A motion to dismiss an information of criminal contempt raising the bar of the statute of limitations upon facts appearing upon the face of the information is equivalent to a special plea in bar setting up those facts, and a judgment sustaining the motion is reviewable under the Criminal Appeals Act as a judgment sustaining a special plea in bar. Id.
3. A person charged with criminal contempt is not put in jeopardy prior to the beginning of the trial by entry of a preliminary order to take testimony for use at the trial. P. 237.
4. Prosecution of a criminal contempt committed by violating an injunction decree entered in a suit brought by the United States under the Anti-Trust Act is not barred in one year under § 25 of The Clayton Act, but in three years under § 1044 Rev.Stats. Id.
Reversed.
Error under the Criminal Appeals Act, to a judgment of the district court dismissing an information for contempt.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United States v. Goldman, 277 U.S. 229 (1928) in 277 U.S. 229 277 U.S. 233. Original Sources, accessed August 30, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=VSKWA1ZJG8S442Z.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United States v. Goldman, 277 U.S. 229 (1928), in 277 U.S. 229, page 277 U.S. 233. Original Sources. 30 Aug. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=VSKWA1ZJG8S442Z.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United States v. Goldman, 277 U.S. 229 (1928). cited in 1928, 277 U.S. 229, pp.277 U.S. 233. Original Sources, retrieved 30 August 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=VSKWA1ZJG8S442Z.
|