|
|
Yates v. Utica Bank, 206 U.S. 181 (1907)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Yates v. Utica Bank, 206 U.S. 181 (1907)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 206 U.S. 158, click here.
Yates v. Utica Bank No. 231-233. Argued March 8, 11, 1907 Decided May 13, 1907 206 U.S. 181
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA
Syllabus
Yates v. Jones National Bank, ante, p. 158, followed, and held further:
That a judgment was rendered upon demurrer does not affect its cogency if it is otherwise efficacious to bring into play the presumption of the thing adjudged.
A judgment of dismissal based on the ground that plaintiff in an action against the directors of a national bank had not set up any individual wrong suffered by him but solely an injury sustained in common with all other creditors of the bank, is not res adjudicata of a right of action between the same parties to recover for individual loss suffered, as distinct from the right of the bank.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Yates v. Utica Bank, 206 U.S. 181 (1907) in 206 U.S. 181 206 U.S. 182. Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=WM8TNVGQXYVRVFW.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Yates v. Utica Bank, 206 U.S. 181 (1907), in 206 U.S. 181, page 206 U.S. 182. Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=WM8TNVGQXYVRVFW.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Yates v. Utica Bank, 206 U.S. 181 (1907). cited in 1907, 206 U.S. 181, pp.206 U.S. 182. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=WM8TNVGQXYVRVFW.
|