|
|
Claiborne v. United States, 465 U.S. 1305 (1965)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Claiborne v. United States, 465 U.S. 1305 (1965)
Claiborne v. United States No. A-615 Decided February 13, 1984 465 U.S. 1305
ON APPLICATION FOR STAY
Syllabus
An application by a Federal District Judge to stay federal criminal proceedings against him is denied, since four Justices of this Court probably would not vote to grant certiorari to review, at this stage of the litigation, the Court of Appeals’ rejection of applicant’s claims that a sitting federal judge may not be criminally prosecuted before being removed from office by impeachment, and that the prosecution against him was "vindictive" or "selective."
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Claiborne v. United States, 465 U.S. 1305 (1965) in 465 U.S. 1305 Original Sources, accessed August 30, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=WMQFUJP7P9B5U3F.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Claiborne v. United States, 465 U.S. 1305 (1965), in 465 U.S. 1305, Original Sources. 30 Aug. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=WMQFUJP7P9B5U3F.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Claiborne v. United States, 465 U.S. 1305 (1965). cited in 1965, 465 U.S. 1305. Original Sources, retrieved 30 August 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=WMQFUJP7P9B5U3F.
|