Greenbelt Co-Op. Publ. Assn., Inc. v. Bresler, 398 U.S. 6 (1970)

Contents:
Author: U.S. Supreme Court

Show Summary

Greenbelt Co-Op. Publ. Assn., Inc. v. Bresler, 398 U.S. 6 (1970)

Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Assn., Inc. v. Bresler


No. 413


Argued February 24-25, 1970
Decided May 18, 1970
398 U.S. 6

CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND

Syllabus

At public meetings before the Greenbelt, Maryland, City Council, the efforts of respondent, a prominent real estate developer and state legislator, to secure zoning variances for certain land he owned while the city was trying to acquire other land of his on which to build a school were vigorously discussed. In publishing in their newspaper full accounts of the meetings, petitioners reported that various citizens had characterized respondent’s negotiating position as "blackmail." Respondent, concededly a "public figure," brought this libel action against petitioners for publishing the reports notwithstanding their knowledge that he had not committed the crime of blackmail. The trial judge instructed the jury that respondent could recover if petitioners’ publications had been made with malice (defined as including "spite, hostility, or deliberate intention to harm") or reckless disregard of whether they were true or false, and that malice could be found from the "language" of the publication itself. The jury found for respondent, and the judgment was affirmed on appeal.

Held:

1. The trial court’s instructions, which permitted the jury to find liability merely on the basis of the reported hostile remarks made during a debate on a public issue, violated the First Amendment as made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth Amendment, whether respondent is considered to be a "public official" or a "public figure." New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254; Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130. Pp. 8-11.

2. In the circumstances of this case, where it is undisputed that petitioners’ reports of the meetings were accurate, the word "blackmail" was not slanderous when spoken, or libelous when reported by petitioners, as there is no evidence whatsoever that the word was used to impute a crime to respondent or was intended as more than a vigorous epithet. Pp. 11-14.

253 Md. 324, 252 A.2d 755, reversed and remanded.

Contents:

Related Resources

None available for this document.

Download Options


Title: Greenbelt Co-Op. Publ. Assn., Inc. v. Bresler, 398 U.S. 6 (1970)

Select an option:

*Note: A download may not start for up to 60 seconds.

Email Options


Title: Greenbelt Co-Op. Publ. Assn., Inc. v. Bresler, 398 U.S. 6 (1970)

Select an option:

Email addres:

*Note: It may take up to 60 seconds for for the email to be generated.

Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Greenbelt Co-Op. Publ. Assn., Inc. v. Bresler, 398 U.S. 6 (1970) in 398 U.S. 6 398 U.S. 7. Original Sources, accessed May 20, 2024, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=XTQNGZMQZIXGNB1.

MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Greenbelt Co-Op. Publ. Assn., Inc. v. Bresler, 398 U.S. 6 (1970), in 398 U.S. 6, page 398 U.S. 7. Original Sources. 20 May. 2024. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=XTQNGZMQZIXGNB1.

Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Greenbelt Co-Op. Publ. Assn., Inc. v. Bresler, 398 U.S. 6 (1970). cited in 1970, 398 U.S. 6, pp.398 U.S. 7. Original Sources, retrieved 20 May 2024, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=XTQNGZMQZIXGNB1.