Chicago & N.W. R. Co. v. Transportation Union, 402 U.S. 570 (1971)

Contents:
Author: U.S. Supreme Court

Show Summary

Chicago & N.W. R. Co. v. Transportation Union, 402 U.S. 570 (1971)

Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v.


United Transportation Union
No. 189


Argued January 18, 1971
Decided June 1, 1971
402 U.S. 570

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Syllabus

Petitioner railroad brought this suit (after formal procedures of the Railway Labor Act had been exhausted) to enjoin a threatened strike by respondent Union, charging that the Union had failed to perform its obligations under § 2 First of the Railway Labor Act "to exert every reasonable effort to make and maintain agreements concerning rates of pay, rules, and working conditions." The Union answered that the Norris-LaGuardia Act deprived the District Court of jurisdiction to enjoin the strike, and that, in any event, the complaint failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted. The District Court, declining to pass on whether either party had violated § 2 First, concluded that the matter was one for administrative determination by the National Mediation Board, and was not justiciable, and that §§ 4 and 7 of the Norris-LaGuardia Act deprived the court of jurisdiction to enjoin the threatened strike. The Court of Appeals affirmed, construing § 2 First as hortatory, and not enforceable by the courts, but only by the National Mediation Board.

Held:

1. Sec. 2 First was intended to be not just a mere exhortation, but an enforceable legal obligation on carriers and employees alike. Pp. 574-578.

2. The obligation imposed by § 2 First, which is central to the effective working of the Railway Labor Act, is enforceable in the courts, rather than by the Mediation Board, as is clear from the Act’s legislative history. Pp. 578-581.

3. Sec. 4 of the Norris-LaGuardia Act does not prohibit the use of a strike injunction where that remedy is the only practical, effective means of enforcing the duty imposed by § 2 First. Pp. 581-584.

422 F.2d 979, reversed and remanded.

HARLAN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and STEWART, MARSHALL, and BLACKMUN, JJ., joined. BRENNAN, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which BLACK, DOUGLAS, and WHITE, JJ., joined, post, p. 584.

Contents:

Related Resources

None available for this document.

Download Options


Title: Chicago & N.W. R. Co. v. Transportation Union, 402 U.S. 570 (1971)

Select an option:

*Note: A download may not start for up to 60 seconds.

Email Options


Title: Chicago & N.W. R. Co. v. Transportation Union, 402 U.S. 570 (1971)

Select an option:

Email addres:

*Note: It may take up to 60 seconds for for the email to be generated.

Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Chicago & N.W. R. Co. v. Transportation Union, 402 U.S. 570 (1971) in 402 U.S. 570 402 U.S. 571. Original Sources, accessed May 20, 2024, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=Y9IB9295WMJLRD6.

MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Chicago & N.W. R. Co. v. Transportation Union, 402 U.S. 570 (1971), in 402 U.S. 570, page 402 U.S. 571. Original Sources. 20 May. 2024. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=Y9IB9295WMJLRD6.

Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Chicago & N.W. R. Co. v. Transportation Union, 402 U.S. 570 (1971). cited in 1971, 402 U.S. 570, pp.402 U.S. 571. Original Sources, retrieved 20 May 2024, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=Y9IB9295WMJLRD6.