|
|
Norfolk & Westery Ry. Co. v. Pub. Svc. Comm’n, 265 U.S. 70 (1924)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Norfolk & Westery Ry. Co. v. Pub. Svc. Comm’n, 265 U.S. 70 (1924)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 265 U.S. 59, click here.
Norfolk & Westery Railway Company v. Public Service Commission No. 187 Argued January 22, 1924 Decided May 5, 1924 265 U.S. 70
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
Syllabus
1. A state constitutionally may require a railroad carrier to provide suitable facilities reasonably necessary for the removal from its premises of freight carried by it for its customers. P. 74.
2. Facts held to justify an order of a state commission requiring a railroad company to construct and maintain a crossing for the use of vehicles to haul such freight across its tracks. P. 72.
3. An order of this kind did not violate the constitutional rights of the carrier by requiring the shipper at whose instance it was made to supply a gate to the crossing, to be kept locked by him when the crossing was not in use, and to provide a watchman to give notice of approaching trains while the crossing was being used by him for transportation of goods across the tracks in vehicles, the carrier not being prevented thereby from permitting use of the crossing for other purposes or installing a watchman of its own. P. 75.
91 W.Va. 414 affirmed.
Error to a judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia sustaining an order of the Public Service Commission in proceedings instituted by the railway company to set it aside as repugnant to the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Norfolk & Westery Ry. Co. v. Pub. Svc. Comm’n, 265 U.S. 70 (1924) in 265 U.S. 70 265 U.S. 71. Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=Z2A2FMWM7132GKG.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Norfolk & Westery Ry. Co. v. Pub. Svc. Comm’n, 265 U.S. 70 (1924), in 265 U.S. 70, page 265 U.S. 71. Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=Z2A2FMWM7132GKG.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Norfolk & Westery Ry. Co. v. Pub. Svc. Comm’n, 265 U.S. 70 (1924). cited in 1924, 265 U.S. 70, pp.265 U.S. 71. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=Z2A2FMWM7132GKG.
|