|
|
Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Tilghman, 237 U.S. 499 (1915)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Tilghman, 237 U.S. 499 (1915)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 237 U.S. 487, click here.
Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Tilghman No. 713 Argued April 22, 23, 1915 Decided May 17, 1915 237 U.S. 499
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Syllabus
The Federal Employers’ Liability Act rejects the common law rule that contributory negligence is a complete defense and adopts the more reasonable rule that the damages shall be diminished in proportion to the amount of negligence attributable to the injured employee. Where the causal negligence is attributable partly to the carrier and partly to the injured employee, the latter is not to recover full damages, but only a diminished sum bearing the same relation to the full damages that the negligence attributable to the carrier bears to the negligence attributable to both, the purpose being to exclude from the recovery a proportional part of the total damages corresponding to the employe’s contribution to the total negligence.
The trial court should not commit to the jury the duty of determining the amount in which the damages should be diminished by reason of the contributory negligence of the employee without advising them of the rule prescribed by the statute for determining the amount of the diminution. It should not be left to their conception of what is reasonable.
167 N.C. 163 reversed.
The facts, which involve the validity of a verdict in the state court in an action for personal injuries brought under the Employers’ Liability Act, are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Tilghman, 237 U.S. 499 (1915) in 237 U.S. 499 237 U.S. 500. Original Sources, accessed August 30, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=Z79QGUV2VZ7JX9X.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Tilghman, 237 U.S. 499 (1915), in 237 U.S. 499, page 237 U.S. 500. Original Sources. 30 Aug. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=Z79QGUV2VZ7JX9X.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Tilghman, 237 U.S. 499 (1915). cited in 1915, 237 U.S. 499, pp.237 U.S. 500. Original Sources, retrieved 30 August 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=Z79QGUV2VZ7JX9X.
|